|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
23 Mar 2005, 16:14 (Ref:1259893) | #1 | ||
Subscriber
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,304
|
GPWC presses on....
Autosport-Atlas are reporting the latest on the GPWC.
http://www.autosport-atlas.com/News.aspx?id=43109&s=5 One point is a name change Although a final decision has not been made by the parties involved about what the new name for the series will be, sources have told Autosport-Atlas that one of the favourites that has been discussed extensively during meetings is for the series to be called GPR - short for 'Grand Prix Racing'. More interesting is the names involved in formulating the structure behind the proposed series and their various roles. Sources have told Autosport-Atlas that the series organisers have set up four separate committees to focus on different elements of the Championship - with a chairman having been agreed to formulate opinion and create a rule book. It is understood that the technical rules are being framed by Williams co-owner Patrick Head and McLaren F1 CEO Martin Whitmarsh, the sporting regulations are being led by McLaren team manager Dave Ryan and the media aspects are being led by BAR marketing director Alistair Watkins. The legal aspects of a successor to the Concorde Agreement, the document by which F1 is run, are being led by Minardi boss Paul Stoddart and a lawyer from the Williams team. At the same time, it's believed that Bernie E is close to a settlement of some sort in his long running court case with the banks http://www.grandprix.com/ns/ns14456.html |
||
__________________
'I've seen it, but still don't believe it.....' |
23 Mar 2005, 16:26 (Ref:1259899) | #2 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 588
|
Quote:
Last edited by StickShift; 23 Mar 2005 at 16:27. |
|||
__________________
Ten-Tenths F1 Results Prediction Competition—2005 Champion! |
23 Mar 2005, 16:29 (Ref:1259901) | #3 | ||
Subscriber
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,304
|
Not surprised by that choice actually, Paul is well known for his in depth knowledge of the Concorde Agreement and always has a copy to hand - as Max Mosley can confirm , I am sure!
|
||
__________________
'I've seen it, but still don't believe it.....' |
23 Mar 2005, 16:41 (Ref:1259903) | #4 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 186
|
Quote:
I am v ery impressed with how they have divied up the responsibilities. |
|||
|
23 Mar 2005, 16:47 (Ref:1259905) | #5 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 588
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Ten-Tenths F1 Results Prediction Competition—2005 Champion! |
23 Mar 2005, 16:51 (Ref:1259912) | #6 | ||
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
Quote:
I'd rather have an independent mind like him than one of the manufacturers. Anyway, as long as we don't have two separate "F1" series, all will be fine. |
||
|
23 Mar 2005, 17:29 (Ref:1259962) | #7 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 294
|
I'm really worried about this, I hope they dont split and ruin 55 years of Tradition over rules and money.
|
||
|
23 Mar 2005, 17:30 (Ref:1259965) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,867
|
Oh my! Paulie is in charge!! With legal aspect no less! Oh dear..
|
||
|
23 Mar 2005, 17:36 (Ref:1259973) | #9 | ||
Forum Host
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,529
|
I think they will reach an agreement.... Ferrari needs competitors to make the sport interesting and over the long term it really is Mac and Williams who have the pedigree to provide this competition.
Meanwhile Ferrari are so marketable that would a "second f1" be as appealing to "casual fans" without a Ferrari? An agreement should be reached but these meetings and making of rules are probably a statement of intent by the GPWC to Bernie and a back up plan for a last resort splitting if it is impossible to continue... |
||
__________________
A byte walks into a bar and orders a pint. Bartender asks him "What's wrong?" Byte says "Parity error." Bartender nods and says "Yeah, I thought you looked a bit off." |
23 Mar 2005, 19:00 (Ref:1260071) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,313
|
Maybe Stoddart is the only person who stepped up to the plate on that issue
|
||
__________________
Ignorance is the easy way out, and the easy way out is rarely the best. Fighting ignorance takes dedication, desire, and effort. |
24 Mar 2005, 14:36 (Ref:1260735) | #11 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,299
|
Stoddart is a good choice.
I'm of the opinion that one of them will have to go - there will be an F1 series, at any rate - who it's run by is the question. |
|
|
24 Mar 2005, 14:49 (Ref:1260747) | #12 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
That's exactly it, Logrence.
This is about control. No-one gains from two rival series - and that won't happen. |
|
|
24 Mar 2005, 15:19 (Ref:1260777) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 588
|
I agree. GPWC is still just a bargaining ploy at this point. Effectively, the series isn't drafting their own consitituion. They are drafting their demands for the 'new' F1.
That being said, if things aren't resolved by 2006. I think GPWC will be in full stride forward. |
||
__________________
Ten-Tenths F1 Results Prediction Competition—2005 Champion! |
24 Mar 2005, 19:42 (Ref:1261023) | #14 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,299
|
I see Bernie cashing in his billions and selling the F1 rights to 'GPR' for a couple more billion.
That's the sensible option, at least. What's the point in being one of the world's richest men if you can't spend a little? |
|
|
24 Mar 2005, 19:46 (Ref:1261026) | #15 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 897
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPWC | xterra48 | Formula One | 40 | 24 Jun 2005 04:14 |
F1 and the GPWC..... | Super Tourer | Formula One | 6 | 5 Dec 2003 23:21 |
STOP PRESSES: Ralf Pases MIchael!!! | EERO | Formula One | 76 | 27 Aug 2003 05:36 |
Gpwc | Edmonton | Formula One | 3 | 14 Aug 2003 02:25 |